[PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: prepare runtime PM support for I2C client devices

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:07:48PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> IMO, this decision belongs to the PM domain, not to the core.  We have
> an established legacy with the current core default (auto) and changing
> that means lots of breakage.

Yup.

> The "forbid by default" can just as easily be handled in the PM domain
> for the group of devices that need it, so why not do it there?

Or at the device level - I'd guess most I2C devices won't end up in a
domain outside of ACPI.  Mika's latest version of the patches address
this issue, the default is left alone.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130912/a652a8d3/attachment.sig>