[PATCH 0/3] perf: parse the dwarf backtrace info from .debug_frame section
Peter Zijlstra
peterz at infradead.org
Thu Sep 12 08:19:53 EDT 2013
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:07:23PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -- Adding more maintainers in the To: list --
>
> Ping about the patch set, is this one acceptable for mainline?
The below looks to be mostly ARM bits and I would suspect Will to take
care of them.
> On 9 September 2013 12:00, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at linaro.org> wrote:
> > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +
> > arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> > arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 23 +++++++++++
> > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/Makefile | 3 ++
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/config/Makefile | 9 +++--
> > tools/perf/util/unwind.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
This one looks to be generic code, Acme who do we want to look at that?
> > 10 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.11.7
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list