[PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard

[Kumar Gala]

On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:

> On 9/9/2013 2:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> <snip>
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \
>>>>>>>>> -	msm8960-cdp.dtb
>>>>>>>>> +	msm8960-cdp.dtb \
>>>>>>>>> +	apq8074-dragonboard.dtb
>>>>>>>> Please add boards alphabetically.
>>>>>>> Will do.
>>>>>>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += armada-370-db.dtb \
>>>>>>>>> 	armada-370-mirabox.dtb \
>>>>>>>>> 	armada-370-rd.dtb \
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>>> index 0000000..5b7b6a0
>>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/ is getting really crowded. It's been working best if the SoC
>>>>>>>> family or vendor is used as a prefix to keep things a bit more organized. In
>>>>>>>> that spirit, prefixing these with msm-<foo> makes sense. Can you please do so?
>>>>>>> Sure. But the board is called an APQ8074 and we wanted to keep the naming consistent with that.
>>>>>> If we do this we should use qcom, not msm as the prefix.  Match the device tree vendor prefix.
> 
> Coming back to this, it would be better if the naming to be consistent with what we call our ARCH - msm and not qcom.
> msm8974-dragonboard signifies quite clearly what the board is.

I was saying qcom,apq8074-dragonboard or we can do the dir thing as we don't have that mean qcom/msm device trees.

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation