Clock framework deadlock with external SPI clockchip
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Wed Sep 4 06:06:06 EDT 2013
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:22:29PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Lars-Peter Clausen (2013-08-30 06:24:45)
> > === Clock chip driver === === SPI master driver ===
> > clk_prepare_lock()
> > spi_sync()
> > wait_for_completion(X)
> Is there a synchronous equivalent to spi_sync()?
spi_sync() is synchronous? Obviously everything is asynchronous up to
that point but the only way the driver can tell if the I/O completed is
using spi_sync() or the equivalent thereof.
If you're asking if there is a way of doing SPI I/O that isn't multi
threaded then there isn't, in order to keep pushing transfers into the
SPI controller to saturate the bus we have a high priority task to push
more data in. SPI buses can be quite high bandwidth in some
applications.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130904/e2ce5315/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list