[PATCH] irqchip: renesas-intc: Document DT bindings
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Nov 28 04:31:40 EST 2013
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 06:40:47AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas at verge.net.au>
> ---
> .../interrupt-controller/renesas,intc-irqc.txt | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,intc-irqc.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,intc-irqc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,intc-irqc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..305d4e7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,intc-irqc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +DT bindings for the R-/SH-Mobile INTC controller
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible: Must be one of the following:
s/be/contain/
> + "renesas,intc"
> + "renesas,intc-r8a73a4"
> + "renesas,intc-r8a7790"
> + "renesas,intc-r8a7791"
> +- #interrupt-cells: has to be <2>: an interrupt index and flags, as defined in
> + interrupts.txt in this directory
I assume you also require a reg to be able to poke the MMIO registers.
And an interrupt-controller annotation.
The example has a series of interrupts. How many do you expect, and what
do they logically correspond to (are they all equivalent, does one
signal errrors, etc)? Are they required or optional?
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +- any properties, listed in interrupts.txt, and any standard resource allocation
> + properties
This is a useless description.
What are "resource allocation properties"?
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + irqc0: interrupt-controller at e61c0000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,irqc-r8a7790", "renesas,irqc";
Do you always expect "renesas,irqc" to be in the list?
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0 0xe61c0000 0 0x200>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <0 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <0 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <0 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <0 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
As mentioned above, these were not described at all.
Thanks,
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list