[PATCH 2/3] regulator: tps6586x: add voltage table for tps658643
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Wed Nov 27 12:09:16 EST 2013
On 11/26/2013 04:45 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Depending on version, the voltage table might be different. Add version
> compatibility to the regulator information in order to select correct
> voltage table.
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
> -static const unsigned int tps6586x_ldo4_voltages[] = {
> +static const unsigned int tps6586x_ldo4_sm2_voltages[] = {
> +static const unsigned int tps658643_sm2_voltages[] = {
What's the logic behind the "ldo4_sm2" v.s. "sm2" naming? Does it match
the data sheet in some way? If not, it might be better to name this
something like "tps6586x_ldo4_voltages" and "tps65863_ldo4_voltages".
> -#define TPS6586X_REGULATOR(_id, _pin_name, vdata, vreg, shift, nbits, \
> - ereg0, ebit0, ereg1, ebit1, goreg, gobit) \
> +#define TPS6586X_REG(_ver, _id, _pin_name, vdata, vreg, shift, nbits, \
> + ereg0, ebit0, ereg1, ebit1, goreg, gobit) \
Why rename the macro?
There's an embedded TAB before "nbits".
> +/* Add version specific entries before any */
> static struct tps6586x_regulator tps6586x_regulator[] = {
> TPS6586X_SYS_REGULATOR(),
> - TPS6586X_LDO(LDO_0, "vinldo01", ldo0, SUPPLYV1, 5, 3, ENC, 0, END, 0),
...
> + TPS6586X_LDO(TPS6586X_ANY, LDO_0, "vinldo01", tps6586x_ldo0, SUPPLYV1,
> + 5, 3, ENC, 0, END, 0),
Rather than changing all the macros and table entries, wouldn't it be
much simpler to:
1) Make tps6586x_regulator[] only contain all the common regulator
definitions.
2) Add new version-specific tables for each version of regulator, so
tps6586x_other_regulator[] and tps65863_regulator[].
3) Have probe() walk multiple tables of regulators, selecting which
tables to walk based on version.
That would result in a much smaller and less invasive diff.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list