[PATCH 11/31] dma: add channel request API that supports deferred probe
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Fri Nov 22 19:05:33 EST 2013
On 11/22/2013 04:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> A question about the patch:
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> [..]
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
>> index 0b88dd3d05f4..928141f6f21b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
>> @@ -181,11 +181,13 @@ struct dma_chan *of_dma_request_slave_channel(struct device_node *np,
>>
>> of_node_put(dma_spec.np);
>>
>> + if (!ofdma && defer)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>> if (chan)
>> return chan;
>> }
>
> Why do we need to make this conditional on the value of 'defer'? If
> the client cares it will propagate the error if it does not care then
> nothing is gained by converting this to -ENODEV.
The function ends up being called from two code-paths. One of which
wants the new behaviour of deferring probe if a valid DMA specifier is
found but there's not registered driver for it, and the other
(compatibility) path wants exactly the old behaviour. The flag is passed
down from dma_request_slave_channel() (old behaviour) or
dma_request_slave_channel_or_err() (new behaviour).
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list