[PATCH RFC 1/4] phy: Add new Exynos5 USB 3.0 PHY driver
Kishon Vijay Abraham I
kishon at ti.com
Wed Nov 20 10:44:44 EST 2013
Hi,
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 03:02 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 20 November 2013 02:27 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Hi Kishon,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>> sorry for the delayed response.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 05:37 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 2:58 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [.....]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> USB3.0 PHY consists of two blocks such as 3.0 block and 2.0 block.
>>>>>>> This USB3.0 PHY can support UTMI+ and PIPE3 interface for 3.0 block
>>>>>>> and 2.0 block, respectively.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Conclusion:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) USB2.0 PHY: USB2.0 HOST, USB2.0 Device
>>>>>>> Base address: 0x1213 0000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) USB3.0 PHY: USB3.0 DRD (3.0 HOST & 3.0 Device)
>>>>>>> Base address: 0x1210 0000
>>>>>>> 2.0 block(UTMI+) & 3.0 block(PIPE3)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And this is of course the PHY used by DWC3 controller, which works at
>>>>>> both High speed as well as Super Speed.
>>>>>> Right ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Right.
>>>>>
>>>>> While 3.0 block(PIPE3) can be used for Super Speed, 2.0 block(UTMI+)
>>>>> can be used for High speed.
>>>>
>>>> It should then come under *single IP muliple PHY* category similar to what
>>>> Sylwester has done.
>>>
>>> Do you mean that i should be including PHY IDs for UTMI+ phy and PIPE3
>>> phy present in this PHY block ?
>>> AFAICS the two phys (UTMI+ and PIPE3) do not really have separate
>>> registers to program, and that's the reason
>>> we program the entire PHY in a shot.
>>
>> you mean you program the same set of bits for UTMI+ and PIPE3?
>
> No, looking closely into PHY datasheet as well as Exynos5250 manual, i
> can see that UTMI+ and PIPE3
> phys have separate bit settings. So i think we should be able to
> segregate the two PHYs (UTMI+ and PIPE3).
> Pardon me for my earlier observations.
no problem..
> Let me clarify more with our h/w team also on this and then i will
> confirm with this.
sure, thanks.
Cheers
Kishon
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kishon
>
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list