[PATCH RFC 4/9] ASoC: hdmi-codec: Add devicetree binding with documentation
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Wed Nov 20 05:09:59 EST 2013
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:23:42AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> But now, I am wondering again about these `empty`codecs:
> - in a DT context, should we continue to add / modify such codecs?
> - what do you think about my generic DT codec? (indeed, I would do a new
> version according to the previous remarks)
We still want to be able to have users just name the CODEC on their
board rather than have to type in all the details from the datasheet,
if we're going to try to amalgamate the drivers it should still let
people do that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131120/09c87c68/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list