[PATCH 3/6] ARM: mm: Drop the lowmem watermark check from virt_addr_valid()
Christoffer Dall
christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Thu Nov 14 19:40:34 EST 2013
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:31:36PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 14 November 2013 07:22 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:37:43PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> Slab allocator can allocate memory beyond the lowmem watermark
> >> which can lead to false failure of virt_addr_valid().
> >>
> >> So drop the check. The issue was seen with percpu_alloc()
> >> in KVM code which was allocating memory beyond lowmem watermark.
> >>
> >> Am not completly sure whether this is the right fix and if it could
> >> impact any other user of virt_addr_valid(). Without this fix as
> >> pointed out the KVM init was failing in my testing.
> >>
> >> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
> >> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> >> Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> >> index 4dd2145..412da47 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> >> @@ -343,8 +343,7 @@ static inline __deprecated void *bus_to_virt(unsigned long x)
> >> #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET PHYS_PFN_OFFSET
> >>
> >> #define virt_to_page(kaddr) pfn_to_page(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> >> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) ((unsigned long)(kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET && (unsigned long)(kaddr) < (unsigned long)high_memory)
> >> -
> >> +#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) ((unsigned long)(kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET)
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> #include <asm-generic/memory_model.h>
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >>
> >
> > This looks wrong to me. Check Documentation/arm/memory.txt, this would
> > return true for the VMALLOC region, which would cause virt_to_phys to
> > give you something invalid, which would be bad.
> >
> I also thought it might not be right fix and hence added a disclaimer
> in the commit message ;-)
>
Yes I know, I'm not holding it against you ;)
Not sure what the nicest fix is though. I think we can get away with
the single page restriction per call for Hyp mappings for now. IIRC the
Hyp code is still limited to be within a single page.
Let's see what Marc has to say.
-Christoffer
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list