[PATCH v2 07/13] ARM: move generic thumb instruction parsing code to new files for use by other features

[David Long]

On 11/13/13 12:09, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:04 -0400, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long at linaro.org>
>>
>> Move the thumb version of the kprobes instruction parsing code into more generic
>
> This patch is moving the 'ARM' instructions, not 'thumb' instructions,
> so both description and title needs fixing for that.

Indeed.  I've fixed it for the next version.

> Actually, after looking at patch 08/13, that one seems to erroneously
> include the thumb reorg, I'm guessing that was meant to be in this patch
> instead, or in a standalone patch?

I've now broken the thumb reorg out into its own patch with appropriate 
description.

>> files from where it can be used by uprobes and possibly other subsystems. The
>> symbol names will be made more generic in a subsequent part of this patchset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/include/asm/probes.h    |   2 +
>>   arch/arm/kernel/Makefile         |   4 +-
>>   arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-arm.c    | 723 +-------------------------------------
>>   arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-common.c | 422 +---------------------
>>   arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c   |   1 +
>>   arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-thumb.c  |   1 +
>>   arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c        |   1 +
>>   arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.h        | 372 --------------------
>>   arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.c     | 730 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.h     |  38 ++
>>   arch/arm/kernel/probes.c         | 441 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/kernel/probes.h         | 395 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   12 files changed, 1622 insertions(+), 1508 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.c
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes-arm.h
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/probes.h
>
> A git tip: if you use the -C argument with git format-patch (and
> send-email I assume) then it will detect files which are copies of
> others and produce a much smaller patch, as well as a more informative
> file summary. I believe that this is OK for submissions posted to
> mailing lists, I know that I've seen people regularly reminded to use -M
> (which detects file renames).
>
> [...]

I will give this a try with the next round.

>
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-arm.c
>> @@ -63,10 +63,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>
>>   #include "kprobes.h"
>> -
>> -#define sign_extend(x, signbit) ((x) | (0 - ((x) & (1 << (signbit)))))
>> -
>> -#define branch_displacement(insn) sign_extend(((insn) & 0xffffff) << 2, 25)
>> +#include "probes.h"
>
> Rather than include "probes.h" after "kprobes.h" here, (and in the other
> 7 places in this patch, and other patches) I think it would make more
> sense to have kprobes.h include probes.h as kprobes code is always going
> to depend on the new generic probe functions.

Suggested change applied for next version.

-dl