[PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: move gpmc headers to include/linux/platform_data
Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk
Tue Nov 12 16:56:55 EST 2013
On 11/12/2013 09:51 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hey Javier,
>
Hi Ezequiel, thanks a lot for your feedback.
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 05:34:02PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The OMAP2+ General-Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC) driver
>> should eventually be moved from arch/arm/mach-omap2 to
>> drivers/memory. Unfortunately this is not trivial since it
>> includes headers files that still resides under mach-omap2
>> and can't be moved easilly.
>>
>> This patch is the first step for taking the gpmc driver
>> outside arch/arm/mach-omap2 by moving its related headers
>> files to include/linux/platform_data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> I wonder what's your plan to move drivers outside of mach-omap2.
>> Currently this driver still includes soc.h and omap_device.h
>> that are on mach-omap2.
>>
>> If we want to move out these two headers files then also omap
>> hwmod and per SoC family headers have to be moved out mach-omap2.
>>
>> Do you want me to do a follow-up patch-set to move all these
>> headers out of mach-omap2 so the gpmc and other drivers can
>> be moved to drivers/?
>>
>> Is include/linux/platform_data the right place to put these
>> headers or there is a better place for them?
>>
>> Thanks a lot and best regards,
>> Javier
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c | 5 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t3517.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-flash.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-flash.h | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c | 5 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ldp.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c | 3 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c | 5 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c | 3 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.h | 27 ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.h | 24 ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smc91x.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smc91x.h | 42 -----
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.h | 35 ----
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h | 231 -----------------------
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c | 3 +-
>> include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-nand-omap.h | 27 +++
>> include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-omap.h | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-onenand-omap.h | 25 +++
>> include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-smc91x-omap.h | 42 +++++
>> include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-smsc911x-omap.h | 35 ++++
>> 35 files changed, 403 insertions(+), 413 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.h
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.h
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smc91x.h
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.h
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-nand-omap.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-omap.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-onenand-omap.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-smc91x-omap.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-smsc911x-omap.h
>>
>
> I'm not too convinced about the above diffstat. Maybe you can try a
> a better approach of making the move by: 1) renaming/moving a file,
> using 'git format-patch -M' and 2) then make the necessary changes
> in the new place.
>
> Or, if the above ends up not fully bisectable you can try first (2)
> then (1).
>
> What bothers me most is seeing things like this:
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.h | 27 ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h | 231 -----------------------
> include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-nand-omap.h | 27 +++
> include/linux/platform_data/gpmc-omap.h | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> What do you think?
>
Agreed, I completely forgot about -M when generating the patches.
I'll wait to see what Tony thinks about this approach to take the gpmc driver
outside of mach-omap2 and send a v2 addressing the issues you pointed out.
Best regards,
Javier
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list