[PATCH RFC 07/10] PM / wakeup : Introduce device_child_may_wakeup

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 01:52:57 PM srinivas.kandagatla at st.com wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla at st.com>
> 
> This patch introduces device_child_may_wakeup function, which will be
> useful for wrapper or SoC level driver power management code.
> Without this patch each driver has to write this same code to get the
> functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla at st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/wakeup.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pm_wakeup.h   |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> index 2d56f41..270f000 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,29 @@ int device_set_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev, bool enable)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_set_wakeup_enable);
>  
> +/* callback for device_child_may_wakeup */
> +static int __device_child_may_wakeup(struct device *dev, void *c)
> +{
> +	return device_may_wakeup(dev);
> +}

This doesn't have anything to do with children in principle, so please call
it differently.  Something like device_may_wakeup_cb() would work for me (and
then you may not need the comment even).

Thanks!

> +
> +/**
> + * device_child_may_wakeup - Check if any of the child devices are wakeup
> + * sources.
> + * @dev: parent device to handle.
> + *
> + * Function to check if any of the children of a given parent are wakeup
> + * sources.
> + *
> + * This function will return true if any one of the children of given parent
> + * are wakeup sources, else it returns false.
> + */
> +bool device_child_may_wakeup(struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	return device_for_each_child(parent, NULL, __device_child_may_wakeup);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_child_may_wakeup);
> +
>  /*
>   * The functions below use the observation that each wakeup event starts a
>   * period in which the system should not be suspended.  The moment this period
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> index a0f7080..b376584 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ extern int device_wakeup_disable(struct device *dev);
>  extern void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool capable);
>  extern int device_init_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool val);
>  extern int device_set_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev, bool enable);
> +bool device_child_may_wakeup(struct device *parent);
>  extern void __pm_stay_awake(struct wakeup_source *ws);
>  extern void pm_stay_awake(struct device *dev);
>  extern void __pm_relax(struct wakeup_source *ws);
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.