[RFC 0/4] Intermix Lowmem and vmalloc
Laura Abbott
lauraa at codeaurora.org
Mon Nov 11 20:24:12 EST 2013
On 11/11/2013 4:13 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:26:48PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an RFC for a feature to allow lowmem and vmalloc virtual address space
>> to be intermixed. This has currently only been tested on a narrow set of ARM
>> chips.
>>
>> Currently on 32-bit systems we have
>>
>>
>> Virtual Physical
>>
>> PAGE_OFFSET +--------------+ PHYS_OFFSET +------------+
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> | lowmem | | direct |
>> | | | mapped |
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> +--------------+------------------>x------------>
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> | | | not-direct|
>> | | | mapped |
>> | vmalloc | | |
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> +--------------+ +------------+
>>
>> Where part of the virtual spaced above PHYS_OFFSET is reserved for direct
>> mapped lowmem and part of the virtual address space is reserved for vmalloc.
>
> Minor nit...
>
> ITYM PAGE_OFFSET here. vmalloc space doesn't exist in physical memory.
>
Yes, that is a typo.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list