[PATCH v5] videobuf2: Add missing lock held on vb2_fop_relase
Hans Verkuil
hverkuil at xs4all.nl
Wed Nov 6 04:07:19 EST 2013
On 11/06/13 09:24, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> From: Ricardo Ribalda <ricardo.ribalda at gmail.com>
>
> vb2_fop_relase does not held the lock although it is modifying the
Small typo: _relase -> _release
> queue->owner field.
>
> This could lead to race conditions on the vb2_perform_io function
> when multiple applications are accessing the video device via
> read/write API:
>
> [ 308.297741] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 0000000000000260
> [ 308.297759] IP: [<ffffffffa07a9fd2>] vb2_perform_fileio+0x372/0x610
> [videobuf2_core]
> [ 308.297794] PGD 159719067 PUD 158119067 PMD 0
> [ 308.297812] Oops: 0000 #1 SMP
> [ 308.297826] Modules linked in: qt5023_video videobuf2_dma_sg
> qtec_xform videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_core
> qtec_white qtec_mem gpio_xilinx qtec_cmosis qtec_pcie fglrx(PO)
> spi_xilinx spi_bitbang qt5023
> [ 308.297888] CPU: 1 PID: 2189 Comm: java Tainted: P O 3.11.0-qtec-standard #1
> [ 308.297919] Hardware name: QTechnology QT5022/QT5022, BIOS
> PM_2.1.0.309 X64 05/23/2013
> [ 308.297952] task: ffff8801564e1690 ti: ffff88014dc02000 task.ti:
> ffff88014dc02000
> [ 308.297962] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa07a9fd2>] [<ffffffffa07a9fd2>]
> vb2_perform_fileio+0x372/0x610 [videobuf2_core]
> [ 308.297985] RSP: 0018:ffff88014dc03df8 EFLAGS: 00010202
> [ 308.297995] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880158a23000 RCX: dead000000100100
> [ 308.298003] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: dead000000200200 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [ 308.298012] RBP: ffff88014dc03e58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
> [ 308.298020] R10: ffffea00051e8380 R11: ffff88014dc03fd8 R12: ffff880158a23070
> [ 308.298029] R13: ffff8801549040b8 R14: 0000000000198000 R15: 0000000001887e60
> [ 308.298040] FS: 00007f65130d5700(0000) GS:ffff88015ed00000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 308.298049] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 308.298057] CR2: 0000000000000260 CR3: 0000000159630000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
> [ 308.298064] Stack:
> [ 308.298071] ffff880156416c00 0000000000198000 0000000000000000
> ffff880100000001
> [ 308.298087] ffff88014dc03f50 00000000810a79ca 0002000000000001
> ffff880154904718
> [ 308.298101] ffff880156416c00 0000000000198000 ffff880154904338
> ffff88014dc03f50
> [ 308.298116] Call Trace:
> [ 308.298143] [<ffffffffa07aa3c4>] vb2_read+0x14/0x20 [videobuf2_core]
> [ 308.298198] [<ffffffffa07aa494>] vb2_fop_read+0xc4/0x120 [videobuf2_core]
> [ 308.298252] [<ffffffff8154ee9e>] v4l2_read+0x7e/0xc0
> [ 308.298296] [<ffffffff8116e639>] vfs_read+0xa9/0x160
> [ 308.298312] [<ffffffff8116e882>] SyS_read+0x52/0xb0
> [ 308.298328] [<ffffffff81784179>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
> [ 308.298335] Code: e5 d6 ff ff 83 3d be 24 00 00 04 89 c2 4c 8b 45 b0
> 44 8b 4d b8 0f 8f 20 02 00 00 85 d2 75 32 83 83 78 03 00 00 01 4b 8b
> 44 c5 48 <8b> 88 60 02 00 00 85 c9 0f 84 b0 00 00 00 8b 40 58 89 c2 41
> 89
> [ 308.298487] RIP [<ffffffffa07a9fd2>] vb2_perform_fileio+0x372/0x610
> [videobuf2_core]
> [ 308.298507] RSP <ffff88014dc03df8>
> [ 308.298514] CR2: 0000000000000260
> [ 308.298526] ---[ end trace e8f01717c96d1e41 ]---
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ricardo.ribalda at gmail.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Comments by Sylvester Nawrocki
>
> fimc-capture and fimc-lite where calling vb2_fop_release with the lock held.
> Therefore a new __vb2_fop_release function has been created to be used by
> drivers that overload the release function.
>
> v3: Comments by Sylvester Nawrocki and Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
> Use vb2_fop_release_locked instead of __vb2_fop_release
>
> v4: Comments by Sylvester Nawrocki
>
> Rename vb2_fop_release_locked to __vb2_fop_release and fix patch format
>
> v5: Comments by Sylvester Nawrocki and Hans Verkuil
>
> Rename __vb2_fop_release to vb2_fop_release_unlock and rearrange
> arguments
I know I suggested the vb2_fop_release_unlock name, but on second thoughts
that's not a good name. I suggest vb2_fop_release_no_lock instead.
'_unlock' suggests that there is a _lock version as well, which isn't the
case here.
After making that change you can add my:
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com>
Regards,
Hans
>
> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c
> index fb27ff7..3035e3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c
> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static int fimc_capture_release(struct file *file)
> vc->streaming = false;
> }
>
> - ret = vb2_fop_release(file);
> + ret = vb2_fop_release_unlock(file);
>
> if (close) {
> clear_bit(ST_CAPT_BUSY, &fimc->state);
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c
> index e5798f7..dc87429 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-lite.c
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int fimc_lite_release(struct file *file)
> mutex_unlock(&entity->parent->graph_mutex);
> }
>
> - vb2_fop_release(file);
> + vb2_fop_release_unlock(file);
> pm_runtime_put(&fimc->pdev->dev);
> clear_bit(ST_FLITE_SUSPENDED, &fimc->state);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> index 594c75e..2716714 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -2619,18 +2619,36 @@ int vb2_fop_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_fop_mmap);
>
> -int vb2_fop_release(struct file *file)
> +static int _vb2_fop_release(struct file *file, struct mutex *lock)
> {
> struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(file);
>
> if (file->private_data == vdev->queue->owner) {
> + if (lock)
> + mutex_lock(lock);
> vb2_queue_release(vdev->queue);
> vdev->queue->owner = NULL;
> + if (lock)
> + mutex_unlock(lock);
> }
> return v4l2_fh_release(file);
> }
> +
> +int vb2_fop_release(struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(file);
> + struct mutex *lock = vdev->queue->lock ? vdev->queue->lock : vdev->lock;
> +
> + return _vb2_fop_release(file, lock);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_fop_release);
>
> +int vb2_fop_release_unlock(struct file *file)
> +{
> + return _vb2_fop_release(file, NULL);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_fop_release_unlock);
> +
> ssize_t vb2_fop_write(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> diff --git a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> index 6781258..6fcb603 100644
> --- a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> +++ b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ int vb2_ioctl_expbuf(struct file *file, void *priv,
>
> int vb2_fop_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> int vb2_fop_release(struct file *file);
> +int vb2_fop_release_unlock(struct file *file);
> ssize_t vb2_fop_write(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos);
> ssize_t vb2_fop_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list