[PATCH v3 4/4] mvebu: Dove: Add clocks and DFS interrupt to cpu node in DT.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, November 01, 2013 02:14:52 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, November 01, 2013 10:07:37 AM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 05:21:03AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > On 1 November 2013 03:56, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, October 31, 2013 08:18:31 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > >> The dove-cpufreq driver needs access to the DDR and CPU clock.  There
> > > > >> is also an interrupt generated when the DFS hardware completes a
> > > > >> change of frequencey. Add these to the cpu node in DT.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> > > > >> Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > I need someone with DT bindings knowledge to ACK this for me.
> > > > 
> > > > I can do that
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > , but this set has to be rebased over all the latest developments
> > > > in cpufreq core before getting posted again..
> > > 
> > > I will wait for -rc1 and rebase.
> > 
> > Actually, it is possible that 3.12-rc8 will be released this weekend.  If that
> > happens, please rebase your patchset on top of the current linux-next and
> > resubmit it next week.
> 
> Hi Rafael
> 
> Just be to sure, since we have had problems with terminology before.
> Do you mean the The linux-next, or your linux next branch?

That shouldn't matter a lot at this point I think.  Generally, if I'm supposed
to take the patches, it's safer to rebase them against my linux-next branch.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.