[PATCH v8] ARM: dts: omap4-panda: Update the LED support for the panda DTS
Dan Murphy
dmurphy at ti.com
Fri May 31 11:19:44 EDT 2013
On 05/31/2013 10:05 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dan Murphy <dmurphy at ti.com> wrote:
>> The GPIO for LED D1 on the omap4-panda a1-a3 rev and the omap4-panda-es
>> are different.
>>
>> A1-A3 = gpio_wk7
>> ES = gpio_110
>>
>> There is no change to LED D2
>>
>> Abstract away the pinmux and the LED definitions for the two boards into
>> the respective DTS files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy at ti.com>
>> ---
>> v8 - Rebase to latest and use pinctrl macros - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2629351/
>> v7 - Update headline to add spaces - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2583661/
>> v6 - Review comments updated - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2582771/
>> v5 - Provide pincrtl phandle to the gpio-led driver - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2573981/
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-common.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-es.dts | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
>> index d5d144a..523a800 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-common.dtsi
>> @@ -16,8 +16,13 @@
>> reg = <0x80000000 0x40000000>; /* 1 GB */
>> };
>>
>> - leds {
>> + leds: leds {
>> compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <
>> + &led_wkgpio_pins
>> + >;
>> +
>> heartbeat {
>> label = "pandaboard::status1";
>> gpios = <&gpio1 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> @@ -157,6 +162,15 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +&omap4_pmx_wkup {
>> + led_wkgpio_pins: pinmux_leds_wkpins {
>> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> + 0x1a (PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpio_wk7 OUTPUT | MODE 3 */
>> + 0x1c (PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE3) /* gpio_wk8 OUTPUT | MODE 3 */
> Hello Dan,
>
> The OUTPUT | MODE 3 in the comments were added so people shouldn't
> have to look at the TRM to find what each constant number meant. But
> now using the macros this is not needed anymore, so I don't think is
> necessary to keep that on the comments.
>
> Best regards,
> Javier
Yes you are correct sending update to remove the comments
--
------------------
Dan Murphy
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list