[PATCH v6 01/10] ASoC: phycore-ac97: Add DT support

Shawn Guo shawn.guo at linaro.org
Wed May 29 09:53:45 EDT 2013


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:47:49PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> Add devicetree support for this audio soc fabric driver.
> 
> platform_of_node and cpu_of_node are set according to the fsl,audmux
> phandle.
> 
> This patch adds handling of ac97 reset functions according to fsl ac97
> support. They are setup from here to avoid board specific code in the
> generic fsl-ssi driver.
> 
> This patch changes the handling of pca100 boards from non-DT to DT only.
> pcm043 is still handled without DT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Changes in v6:
>      - phycore-ac97 now manages the ac97 reset functions of the boards using
>        this combination of ssi-codec.
>      - Removed preprocessor ifs for DT, non-DT distinction. pcm043 is now
>        non-DT only and pca100 DT only.
>     
>     Changes in v4:
>      - New property phytec,audmux to check which audmux setup should be
>        executed. Checking for fsl,imx21-audmux and fsl,imx31-audmux.
>     
>     Changes in v3:
>      - Add some more information in the commit message.
>     
>     Changes in v2:
>      - Simplify the driver, by combining audmux port configurations. The
>        audmux driver actually knows on which platform he is running and
>        will return the appropriate error code if we use functions for
>        another platform. So we don't need to have the knowledge about it
>        in phycore-ac97 and can try both functions. This removes the need
>        of different compatibilities and renames it to phycore-ac97.
>      - Use a phandle for the cpu_dai link.
>      - Add devicetree binding documentation.
>      - Rename binding to phytec,phycore-ac97 and fsl,ssi to phytec,ssi
>     
>     Changes in v2:
>      - Simplify the driver, by combining audmux port configurations. The
>        audmux driver actually knows on which platform he is running and
>        will return the appropriate error code if we use functions for
>        another platform. So we don't need to have the knowledge about it
>        in phycore-ac97 and can try both functions. This removes the need
>        of different compatibilities and renames it to imx27-ac97.
>      - Use a phandle for the cpu_dai link.
>      - Add devicetree binding documentation.
>      - Rename binding to phytec,phycore-ac97 and fsl,ssi to phytec,ssi
> 
>  .../bindings/sound/phytec,phycore-ac97.txt         |  14 ++
>  sound/soc/fsl/phycore-ac97.c                       | 241 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/phytec,phycore-ac97.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/phytec,phycore-ac97.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/phytec,phycore-ac97.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..41201ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/phytec,phycore-ac97.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +Phytec phycore AC97
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: "phytec,phycore-ac97"
> +- phytec,ssi: A phandle to the ssi device that is connected to ac97.
> +- phytec,audmux: A phandle to the audmux device.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +sound {
> +	compatible = "phytec,phycore-ac97";
> +	phytec,ssi = <&ssi1>;
> +	phytec,audmux = <&audmux>;
> +};
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/phycore-ac97.c b/sound/soc/fsl/phycore-ac97.c
> index ae403c2..bf2c600 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/phycore-ac97.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/phycore-ac97.c
> @@ -20,8 +20,14 @@
>  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
>  
>  #include "imx-audmux.h"
> +#include "fsl_ssi.h"
> +
> +#define DRV_NAME "phycore-audio-fabric"
>  
>  static struct snd_soc_card imx_phycore;
> +static struct device_node *phycore_dai_cpu_node;
> +static void (*phycore_ac97_reset) (struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
> +static void (*phycore_ac97_warm_reset)(struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
>  
>  static struct snd_soc_ops imx_phycore_hifi_ops = {
>  };
> @@ -32,12 +38,12 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link imx_phycore_dai_ac97[] = {
>  		.stream_name	= "HiFi",
>  		.codec_dai_name		= "wm9712-hifi",
>  		.codec_name	= "wm9712-codec",
> -		.cpu_dai_name	= "imx-ssi.0",
> -		.platform_name	= "imx-ssi.0",

I do not think these and phycore_ac97_plat_name changes are necessary,
since of_node will always take precedence over name in match.

>  		.ops		= &imx_phycore_hifi_ops,
>  	},
>  };
>  
> +static const char phycore_ac97_plat_name[] = "imx-ssi.0";
> +
>  static struct snd_soc_card imx_phycore = {
>  	.name		= "PhyCORE-ac97-audio",
>  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> @@ -45,40 +51,52 @@ static struct snd_soc_card imx_phycore = {
>  	.num_links	= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_phycore_dai_ac97),
>  };
>  
> -static struct platform_device *imx_phycore_snd_ac97_device;
> +static void phycore_ac97_imx21_audmux(void)
> +{
> +	imx_audmux_v1_configure_port(MX27_AUDMUX_HPCR1_SSI0,
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TFCSEL(3) |
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TCLKDIR | /* clock is output */
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_RXDSEL(3));
> +	imx_audmux_v1_configure_port(3,
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TFCSEL(0) |
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TFSDIR |
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_RXDSEL(0));
> +}
> +
> +static void phycore_ac97_imx31_audmux(void)
> +{
> +	imx_audmux_v2_configure_port(3,
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TFSEL(0) |
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TFSDIR,
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PDCR_RXDSEL(0));
> +	imx_audmux_v2_configure_port(0,
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TCSEL(3) |
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TCLKDIR, /* clock is output */
> +		IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PDCR_RXDSEL(3));
> +}
> +
>  static struct platform_device *imx_phycore_snd_device;
>  
> +static struct platform_device *imx_phycore_snd_ac97_device;
> +
>  static int __init imx_phycore_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (machine_is_pca100()) {
> -		imx_audmux_v1_configure_port(MX27_AUDMUX_HPCR1_SSI0,
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TFCSEL(3) |
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TCLKDIR | /* clock is output */
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_RXDSEL(3));
> -		imx_audmux_v1_configure_port(3,
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TFCSEL(0) |
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_TFSDIR |
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V1_PCR_RXDSEL(0));
> -	} else if (machine_is_pcm043()) {
> -		imx_audmux_v2_configure_port(3,
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TFSEL(0) |
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TFSDIR,
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PDCR_RXDSEL(0));
> -		imx_audmux_v2_configure_port(0,
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_SYN | /* 4wire mode */
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TCSEL(3) |
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PTCR_TCLKDIR, /* clock is output */
> -			IMX_AUDMUX_V2_PDCR_RXDSEL(3));
> +	if (machine_is_pcm043()) {
> +		phycore_ac97_imx31_audmux();
>  	} else {
>  		/* return happy. We might run on a totally different machine */
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].cpu_dai_name = phycore_ac97_plat_name;
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].platform_name = phycore_ac97_plat_name;
> +
>  	imx_phycore_snd_ac97_device = platform_device_alloc("soc-audio", -1);
>  	if (!imx_phycore_snd_ac97_device)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -108,18 +126,189 @@ fail2:
>  	platform_device_del(imx_phycore_snd_ac97_device);
>  fail1:
>  	platform_device_put(imx_phycore_snd_ac97_device);
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].cpu_dai_name = NULL;
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].platform_name = NULL;
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void __exit imx_phycore_exit(void)
>  {
> +	if (!machine_is_pcm043())
> +		return;
> +
>  	platform_device_unregister(imx_phycore_snd_device);
>  	platform_device_unregister(imx_phycore_snd_ac97_device);
> +
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].cpu_dai_name = NULL;
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].platform_name = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  late_initcall(imx_phycore_init);
>  module_exit(imx_phycore_exit);
>  
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id imx_phycore_ac97_of_dev_id[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "phytec,phycore-ac97",
> +	}, {
> +		/* sentinel */
> +	}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_phycore_ac97_of_dev_id);
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * Pointer to AC97 reset functions for specific boards
> + */
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_PCA100)
> +extern void pca100_ac97_cold_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
> +extern void pca100_ac97_warm_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
> +#else
> +void pca100_ac97_cold_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) { }
> +void pca100_ac97_warm_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) { }

static?

> +#endif
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_PCM043)
> +extern void pcm043_ac97_cold_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
> +extern void pcm043_ac97_warm_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97);
> +#else
> +void pcm043_ac97_cold_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) { }
> +void pcm043_ac97_warm_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) { }
> +#endif
> +
> +static void phycore_soc_ac97_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97)
> +{
> +	if (phycore_ac97_reset)
> +		phycore_ac97_reset(ac97);
> +	/* First read sometimes fails, do a dummy read */
> +	fsl_ssi_ac97_read(ac97, 0);

This function is unavailable until patch #7, right?

> +}
> +
> +static void phycore_soc_ac97_warm_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97)
> +{
> +	if (phycore_ac97_warm_reset)
> +		phycore_ac97_warm_reset(ac97);
> +
> +	/* First read sometimes fails, do a dummy read */
> +	fsl_ssi_ac97_read(ac97, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int phycore_ac97_setup_devices(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	imx_phycore_snd_device = platform_device_alloc("wm9712-codec", -1);
> +	if (!imx_phycore_snd_device)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = platform_device_add(imx_phycore_snd_device);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "ASoC: Platform device allocation failed\n");
> +		goto fail1;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&imx_phycore);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "ASoC: soc card registration failed\n");
> +		goto fail2;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +
> +fail2:
> +	platform_device_del(imx_phycore_snd_device);
> +fail1:
> +	platform_device_put(imx_phycore_snd_device);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_phycore_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct device_node *ssi_np;
> +	struct device_node *audmux_np;
> +	const char *sprop;
> +	const char *p;
> +
> +	imx_phycore.dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> +	audmux_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "phytec,audmux", 0);
> +	if (!audmux_np) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to parse phytec,audmux phandle\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(audmux_np, "fsl,imx21-audmux")) {
> +		phycore_ac97_imx21_audmux();
> +	} else if (of_device_is_compatible(audmux_np, "fsl,imx31-audmux")) {
> +		phycore_ac97_imx31_audmux();
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unknown audmux, failed to setup audmux\n");
> +		of_node_put(audmux_np);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	of_node_put(audmux_np);
> +
> +	ssi_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "phytec,ssi", 0);
> +	if (!ssi_np) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No valid ssi phandle found\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].cpu_of_node = ssi_np;
> +	imx_phycore_dai_ac97[0].platform_of_node = ssi_np;
> +	phycore_dai_cpu_node = ssi_np;
> +
> +	sprop = of_get_property(of_find_node_by_path("/"), "compatible", NULL);
> +	p = strrchr(sprop, ',');
> +	if (p)
> +		sprop = p + 1;
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(sprop, "imx27-pca100")) {

Since this is a phycore/phytec specific ASoC-machine driver, what's the
problem with matching the machine compatible string by simply calling
of_machine_is_compatible()?

> +		phycore_ac97_reset = pca100_ac97_cold_reset;
> +		phycore_ac97_warm_reset = pca100_ac97_warm_reset;
> +	} else if (!strcmp(sprop, "imx35-pcm043")) {
> +		phycore_ac97_reset = pcm043_ac97_cold_reset;
> +		phycore_ac97_warm_reset = pcm043_ac97_warm_reset;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set AC97 reset functions, unknown board.\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	fsl_ssi_ac97_set_reset(phycore_soc_ac97_reset,
> +			phycore_soc_ac97_warm_reset);
> +
> +	ret = phycore_ac97_setup_devices(pdev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		of_node_put(phycore_dai_cpu_node);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_phycore_ac97_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	of_node_put(phycore_dai_cpu_node);
> +	phycore_dai_cpu_node = NULL;
> +
> +	platform_device_unregister(imx_phycore_snd_device);

snd_soc_unregister_card() call is missing?

Shawn

> +
> +	phycore_ac97_reset = NULL;
> +	phycore_ac97_warm_reset = NULL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver imx_phycore_ac97_driver = {
> +	.probe		= imx_phycore_ac97_probe,
> +	.remove		= imx_phycore_ac97_remove,
> +	.driver		= {
> +		.name	= DRV_NAME,
> +		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +		.of_match_table = imx_phycore_ac97_of_dev_id,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(imx_phycore_ac97_driver);
> +
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PhyCORE ALSA SoC driver");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRV_NAME ": PhyCORE ALSA SoC fabric driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -- 
> 1.8.2.1
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list