[GIT PULL] Renesas ARM based r8a7740 SoC updates for v3.11

[Simon Horman]

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:58:48PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 05:59:41PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Hi Olof,
> > 
> > The following changes since commit c7788792a5e7b0d5d7f96d0766b4cb6112d47d75:
> > 
> >   Linux 3.10-rc2 (2013-05-20 14:37:38 -0700)
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git tags/renesas-soc-r8a7740-for-v3.11
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to 0a9e1c1eef2b050a16685952ce20575348b94d5c:
> > 
> >   ARM: shmobile: clock-r8a7740: add TPU PWM support (2013-05-27 17:45:27 +0900)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Renesas ARM based r8a7740 SoC updates for v3.11
> > 
> > * Clean-ups from Kuninori Morimoto, Magnus Damm and Laurent Pinchart.
> > * Extended clock coverage by Bastian Hecht.
> > * Support for initialising GIC from OF by Bastian Hecht.
> > * Support for reference DT initialisation by Bastian Hecht.
> >   This is used in conjunction with other changes initialise
> >   the Armadillo 800 eva board in DT as much as possible.
> > * Suspend to RAM and CPUIdle support by Bastian Hecht
> > * Build fix for fallout by Arnd Bergmann from suspend to RAM change.
> 
> So, looking at this branch, I think you need to reorganize your patches a bit.
> You seem to have fallen back to the case of only sorting patches by what
> Renesas SoC they are for, while they are clearly of different kinds such that
> we would prefer to see them sorted differently for arm-soc.
> 
> For example, the fix from Arnd should go in a shared shmobile fixes branch,
> ideally. Some of the DT initialization should maybe go in a separate
> (shmobile-shared) DT branch. Clock, suspend/resume and other patches can go in
> a shared SoC branch across all of shmobile though.
> 
> Care to respin? I had a handful of comments on the patches as well, and I'll
> continue to look at some of the other ones.
> 
> Since you'll have to respin, we might as well see the reshuffling into shared
> shmobile branches, so I'll drop the three merges I had already done of
> SoC-specific branches. I'll follow up on the ones I claimed to have merged.
> None had been pushed out anyway.

Sure, I will re-spin and try to re-arange my branches as you describe above.