[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix support of Exynos4210 rev0 SoC
Tomasz Figa
t.figa at samsung.com
Thu May 23 06:37:54 EDT 2013
Hi Kukjin,
On Thursday 23 of May 2013 10:11:17 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Kukjin,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Wednesday 15 of May 2013 17:08:04 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > This patch extends exynos_init_time() function to handle Exynos4210
> >
> > rev0
> >
> > > > SoC, which differs in availability of system timers and needs
> >
> > different
> >
> > > > clocksource initialization.
> > > >
> > > > This makes it possible to use exynos_init_time() function as init_time
> > > > callback for all Exynos-based boards, including Universal_C210, which
> > > > originally had to use samsung_timer_init().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 30
> > > >
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
> > > >
> > > > | 2 ++
> > > >
> > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c | 5 ++---
> > > > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Could you pick this patch to your fixes branch?
> >
> > Yeah, I will after looking at.
> >
> > > This is a fix of a regression in handling Exynos4210 rev0 SoC (e.g.
> > > Universal C210 board) introduced by patches merged to 3.10.
> >
> > OK, I see but I didn't review yet and I will within a couple of days ;-)
>
> OK, looks fine, this will be sent to upstream during -rc for v3.10.
Thanks.
> But, Tomasz, as you know, non-DT supporting files will be gone away in
> v3.11, just note.
Sure. This is a good thing.
In 3.11 Universal C210 will be supported only using device tree, but for 3.10
we need this patch to make the old board file still work.
Best regards,
--
Tomasz Figa
Linux Kernel Developer
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list