[PATCH V2 1/6] drivers: bus: add a new driver for WEIM
Huang Shijie
b32955 at freescale.com
Thu May 23 05:35:42 EDT 2013
于 2013年05月23日 17:23, Sascha Hauer 写道:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 04:16:13PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> + <cs-number> 0<physical address of mapping> <size>
>> +
>> +Timing property for child nodes. It is mandatory, not optional.
>> +
>> + - fsl,weim-cs-timing: The timing array, contains 6 timing values for the
>> + child node. We can get the CS index from the child
>> + node's "reg" property.
> This should be more detailed, something like:
>
> This contains the values for the registers EIM_CSnGCR1, EIM_CSnGCR2,
> EIM_CSnRCR1, EIM_CSnRCR2, EIM_CSnWCR1, EIM_CSnWCR2 in this order.
>
do you mean i should add some new properties, such as
"fsl,eim_csnrcr1", "fsl,eim_csnrcr2" ...
>> +static int weim_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *child;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
>> + if (!child->name)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + ret = weim_timing_setup(pdev, child);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto parse_fail;
>> +
>> + if (!of_platform_device_create(child, NULL,&pdev->dev)) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto parse_fail;
>> + }
> I would print some warning here for the failures in this loop, but I
> don't think it's necessary to bail out. No need to make all WEIM devices
> fail if one has an erroneous device node.
>
ok.
>> +
>> + /* get the resource */
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + weim->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(weim->base)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(weim->base);
>> + goto weim_err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* get the clock */
>> + weim->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(weim->clk))
>> + goto weim_err;
>> +
>> + clk_prepare_enable(weim->clk);
>> +
>> + /* parse the device node */
>> + ret = weim_parse_dt(pdev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(weim->clk);
>> + goto weim_err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "WEIM driver registered.\n");
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +weim_err:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int weim_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct imx_weim *weim = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(weim->clk);
> Once again: Is this clock needed for the child devices? If yes, you
> can't disable it here and leave the child devices registered.
>
again. yes. we need this clock.
thanks
Huang Shijie
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list