[RFC PATCHv3 3/6] clk: Add TI-Nspire clock drivers
arnd at arndb.de
Mon May 20 08:26:30 EDT 2013
On Monday 20 May 2013 21:19:33 Daniel Tang wrote:
> On 20/05/2013, at 5:48 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 May 2013, Daniel Tang wrote:
> >> If the vendors for the on-SOC components are unknown, should we just
> >> leave the compatible strings as is (i.e. "nspire-XXX")?
> > In that case, I would use the name of the company that made the SoC.
> > I believe someone mentioned it was made by LSI logic.
> Yep, that's right. So "lsi,nspire-XXX" should be fine?
I wouldn't use that combination, since lsi did not make the nspire.
For anything on the LSI chip, "lsi,zevio-XXX" would be correct,
or maybe "lsi,zevio1020-XXX" for something specific to a particular
SoC variant. For off-SoC parts, "ti,nspire-XXX" would be right,
or "ti,nspire-cx-XXX" if you care about the model.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel