[PATCH 2/2] ARM: mvebu: Add support for NOR flash device on Armada XP-DB board

[Jason Cooper]

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 09:13:26AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Jason Cooper,
> 
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:56:56 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:09:58AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > The Armada XP Development Board (DB-78460-BP) has a NOR flash device
> > > connected to the Device Bus. This commit adds the device tree node
> > > to support this device.
> > > 
> > > This SoC supports a flexible and dynamic decoding window allocation
> > > scheme; but since this feature is still not implemented we need
> > > to specify the window base address in the device tree node itself.
> > > 
> > > This base address has been selected in a completely arbitrary fashion.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-db.dts | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Applied to mvebu/fixes
> 
> Is mvebu/fixes the branch intended to be pushed to 3.10-rcX, or to
> 3.11 ?
> 
> I'm asking because you've applied both 1/2 and 2/2 on the same
> mvebu/fixes branch, while 1/2 is intended for 3.10-rcX (fixing
> existing DT data), and 2/2 is intended for 3.11 (adding support for a
> new device in the DT).

I've added it to /fixes because it implements the same fix the other
patch did for the change in DT parsing.  I debated asking Ezequiel to
split it into two patches, one for the ranges fix, the other for the new
nodes.  In the end, since it isn't C code, I elected for simplicity.

thx,

Jason.