[RFC 4/4] DRM: tda998x: add missing include
Sebastian Hesselbarth
sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com
Sun May 19 04:30:00 EDT 2013
On 05/19/2013 08:01 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:09 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth<sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So in the end, we will have a DT node for the HW controllers found
>> in Dove SoCs, a node for TDA998x, and a node for the video card, i.e.
>> _how_ lcd controllers, external encoders, clocks, maybe audio, ...
>> are hooked up on that specific board.
>
> Here is my dove-cubox.dts. What is wrong with it?
Oh come on, seriously?
There is _nothing_ wrong with it, it already reflects what I told you
would be required for generic Dove SoC board video.
> video {
> compatible = "marvell,dove-video";
> };
As you may have noticed, the RFC node I sent yesterday. Is in _no_ way
different from a functional point of view. I added a video-memory
property, I renamed the compatible string. And I moved clocks property
to the video card *but* as I said in the RFC description:
"This adds a video card node required for rmk's dove_drm driver. Reg
property matches reserved memory region (currently 16M at top of
memory), clocks property should carry extclk0 for now."
It is a node *required for rmk's dove_drm driver* for you to _test_
that very driver.
> &lcd0 {
> status = "okay";
> clocks =<&core_clk 3>,<0>,<&lcdclk>,<&si5351 0>;
> marvell,port-type =<11>; /* HDMIA */
> marvell,external-encoder =<&tda998x>;
> };
Again, there is no DT support in *rmk's driver*! I didn't add those
to the RFC node. I provided a DT node to *test* rmk driver. While
you were busy with complaining about things we already answered,
I did test the driver on both Cubox and D2Plug. Now I can start
with looking into rmk's driver and _suggest_ to fix this or that.
> /* --- test (not cubox) ---- *
> &dcon { status = "okay"; };
>
> &lcd1 {
> status = "okay";
> clocks =<&core_clk 3>,<0>,<&lcdclk>,<0>;
> marvell,port-type =<1>;
> display-timings {
> mode {
> hactive =<1920>;
> vactive =<1080>;
> hfront-porch =<88>;
> hsync-len =<44>;
> hback-porch =<148>;
> vfront-porch =<4>;
> vsync-len =<5>;
> vback-porch =<36>;
> clock =<148500>;
> };
> };
I would be surprised if, lcd1 will ever be capable of driving
1080p60 on a *VGA port*!
Seriously, start _reading_ what we say. I want all those
features I already told you for your driver, in mainline driver
too. All I told you was to prevent you from doing dirty little
Cubox specific hacks that I would have to remove for e.g. D2Plug.
*But* if you ask me if we should take Russell's or your driver
as a basis, the answer is Russell's. Colon.
Sebastian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list