[PATCH 6/6] ARM: tegra114: add CPU hotplug support
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Wed May 15 19:11:41 EDT 2013
On 05/15/2013 04:27 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> The Tegra114 is a quad cores SoC. Each core can be hotplugged including
> CPU0. The hotplug sequence can be controlled by setting event trigger in
> flow controller. Then the flow controller will take care all the power
> sequence that include CPU up and down.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC) += sleep-tegra30.o
CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC also adds that to obj-y. Will including it
twice cause problems?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset-handler.S b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset-handler.S
> * CPU boot vector when restarting the a CPU following
> * an LP2 transition. Also branched to by LP0 and LP1 resume after
> * re-enabling sdram.
> + *
> + * r6: SoC ID << 8
I meant to ask in patch 1: Perhaps the macro could do a >>8 so that code
can compare directly against the SoC IDs instead of having to compare
against shifted values.
> + tegra_check_soc_id TEGRA114, TEGRA_APB_MISC_BASE, r6, r7
> + beq no_cpu0_chk
Does that need a THUMB(it ...) added? Same elsewhere.
> + cmp r6, #(TEGRA114 <<8)
Needs a space after <<.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S
> @@ -45,12 +46,17 @@ ENDPROC(tegra30_hotplug_shutdown)
> * and powergates it -- flags (in R0) indicate the request type.
> * Must never be called for CPU 0.
That comment is wrong now, I think.
> tst r0, #TEGRA30_POWER_HOTPLUG_SHUTDOWN
> + beq flow_ctrl_setting_for_lp2
> +
> + /* flow controller set up for hotplug */
> + mov r3, #FLOW_CTRL_WAITEVENT @ For hotplug
> + b flow_ctrl_done
> +flow_ctrl_setting_for_lp2:
> + /* flow controller set up for LP2 */
> + cmp r10, #(TEGRA30 << 8)
> moveq r3, #FLOW_CTRL_WAIT_FOR_INTERRUPT @ For LP2
Do you need e.g. "movne r3, #0" or similar here? Otherwise, I think r3
ends up not being initialized.
> - movne r3, #FLOW_CTRL_WAITEVENT @ For hotplug
> +flow_ctrl_done:
> + cmp r10, #(TEGRA30 << 8)
> str r3, [r2]
I wonder whether creating a separate tegra114_cpu_shutdown() wouldn't be
better, to avoid all the runtime conditional code.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list