[PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: Fix iva2_pwrdm settings for 3703
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Wed May 15 13:07:35 EDT 2013
* Mark A. Greer <mgreer at animalcreek.com> [130514 18:57]:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:25:37PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Commit a819c4f1 (ARM: OMAP3: PM: Only access IVA if one exists)
> > changed PM to not access IVA registers on omaps that don't have
> > them. Turns out we still need to idle iva2 as otherwise iva2_pwrdm
> > will stay on and block deeper idle states.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Paul & Kevin, do you have better ideas for fixing this?
> >
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > @@ -546,8 +546,10 @@ static void __init prcm_setup_regs(void)
> > /* Clear any pending PRCM interrupts */
> > omap2_prm_write_mod_reg(0, OCP_MOD, OMAP3_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
> >
> > - if (omap3_has_iva())
> > - omap3_iva_idle();
> > + /*
> > + * We need to idle iva2_pwrdm even on am3703 with no iva2.
> > + */
> > + omap3_iva_idle();
> >
> > omap3_d2d_idle();
> > }
>
> [Kevin, Paul, some background: Tony discovered that the am3703 needs
> to have omap3_iva_idle() called even though its not supposed to have
> an IVA.]
>
> This is potentially bad for other SoC's that don't have an IVA so I don't
> think its the way to go. My preference would be to set the OMAP3_HAS_IVA
> flag for the am3703 only since its the one with the bug. Maybe something
> in id.c:omap3xxx_check_features() but I don't see any existing way to check
> for an am3703 vs. other am37xx SoCs. Any ideas?
>
> Another option, I suppose, is a dts entry but I don't like that at all.
It seems that iva2_pwrdm is there for all omap3 even if OMAP3_HAS_IVA
flag is unset. And if that's the case, iva2 clocks still need to be idled
in all cases.
It's possible that not all steps in omap3_iva_idle() are needed though.
I can debug further to see which part of the omap3_iva_idle() are needed.
Mark, do you have some omap3 with no iva (other than am3703) to test the
idle states with?
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list