[PATCH 03/21] ARM: shmobile: don't call irqchip_init unconditionally

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:22:22PM +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2013/5/8 Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> >> > > index 8871f77..5dc57f1 100644
> >> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> >> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> >> > > @@ -53,14 +53,23 @@ static void __init r8a7740_init_irq_common(void)
> >> > >
> >> > >  void __init r8a7740_init_irq_of(void)
> >> > >  {
> >> > > +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> >> > > +               return;
> >> > > +
> >> > >         irqchip_init();
> >> >
> >> > Why not have an empty irqchip_init? I'd guess we'll need this on other
> >> > platforms and your default mach.
> >>
> >> Thanks, I think that could work.
> >>
> >> I will see about making it so.
> >
> > Ping
> 
> I have sent out a patch adding an empty irqchip_init() when
> CONFIG_IRQCHIP is not set with the subject
> [PATCH] irqchip: Add irqchip_init dummy function

Thanks.

> > Linux-next is still broken for me. There is also anothe shmobile build bug,
> > I'll send a separate patch for that, which also needs to go into your tree.

Sorry about that. I though I had pushed your fix (the first hunk of the
patch that started this thread), but it seems that I did not.

> Oh thanks Arnd for this fix!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>  Bastian