Latest build results - errors/warnings - lots of them
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Thu May 2 14:03:26 EDT 2013
On Thursday 02 May 2013, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> index e3c0ae9..e3f3cba 100644
> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -250,12 +250,6 @@ void thermal_unregister_governor(struct
> thermal_governor *);
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET
> extern int thermal_generate_netlink_event(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> enum events event);
> -#else
> -static int thermal_generate_netlink_event(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> - enum events event)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> #endif
Actually it seems this bug is already fixed in linux-next:
commit f8b587055a793c7719f0d4f41b7b4aeeef43aa2d
Author: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed Mar 20 21:38:07 2013 +0000
thermal: Fix compiler warning
The following warning is obtained when CONFIG_NET is not defined:
In file included from drivers/thermal/mvebu_thermal.c:27:0:
include/linux/thermal.h:254:12: warning: 'thermal_generate_netlink_event'
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
This patch fixes the warning by properly inlining
thermal_generate_netlink_event().
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang at intel.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
index f0bd7f9..fd7b8f3 100644
--- a/include/linux/thermal.h
+++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ void thermal_unregister_governor(struct thermal_governor *);
extern int thermal_generate_netlink_event(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
enum events event);
#else
-static int thermal_generate_netlink_event(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
+static inline int thermal_generate_netlink_event(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
enum events event)
{
return 0;
Your patch also seems correct, but it would conflict with Ezequiel's.
The problem was apparently that you removed the 'inline' keyword
in 8ab3e6a08a "thermal: Use thermal zone device id in netlink messages",
I assume by accident, since defining a non-inline function in a header
file is obviously wrong.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list