Re[2]: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP-USB: Fix possible memory leak

Alexander Shiyan shc_work at mail.ru
Thu May 2 12:28:44 EDT 2013


> On 20:03-20130502, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work at mail.ru>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c
> > index aa27d7f..8d17a0d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c
> > @@ -570,8 +570,10 @@ static int usbhs_add_regulator(char *name, char *dev_id, char *dev_supply,
> >  	supplies->dev_name = dev_id;
> >  
> >  	reg_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*reg_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!reg_data)
> > +	if (!reg_data) {
> > +		kfree(supplies);
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	reg_data->constraints.valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS;
> >  	reg_data->consumer_supplies = supplies;
> > @@ -579,8 +581,11 @@ static int usbhs_add_regulator(char *name, char *dev_id, char *dev_supply,
> >  
> >  	config = kmemdup(&hsusb_reg_config, sizeof(hsusb_reg_config),
> >  			GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!config)
> > +	if (!config) {
> > +		kfree(supplies);
> > +		kfree(reg_data);
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	config->supply_name = name;
> >  	config->gpio = gpio;
> > @@ -589,17 +594,25 @@ static int usbhs_add_regulator(char *name, char *dev_id, char *dev_supply,
> >  
> >  	/* create a regulator device */
> >  	pdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!pdev)
> > +	if (!pdev) {
> > +		kfree(supplies);
> > +		kfree(reg_data);
> > +		kfree(config);
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	pdev->id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO;
> >  	pdev->name = reg_name;
> >  	pdev->dev.platform_data = config;
> >  
> >  	ret = platform_device_register(pdev);
> > -	if (ret)
> > +	if (ret) {
> >  		pr_err("%s: Failed registering regulator %s for %s\n",
> >  				__func__, name, dev_id);
> > +		kfree(supplies);
> > +		kfree(reg_data);
> > +		kfree(config);
> > +	}
> 
> Might be better to switch to devm_XXX managed functions?

If anyone can rewrite driver to use devm_xx, it would have been better.
I'm not going to redo the patch yet, let it be so, I just showed a point
for OMAP-developers.
Thanks.

---


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list