[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks
Ian Campbell
Ian.Campbell at citrix.com
Thu May 2 07:02:13 EDT 2013
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:54 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:38 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > > > index d30042e..8f040a0 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > > > > #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> > > > > +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> > > > > @@ -172,6 +173,8 @@ static int __init xen_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> > > > > later ones fail to. */
> > > > > per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
> > > > > }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
> > > >
> > > > Is this called for the boot processor too?
> > >
> > > Yep.
> > >
> > > > (do you have a linux-next branch where I can easily find the baseline
> > > > for this series?)
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sstabellini/xen.git lost_ticks_1
> >
> > Is that your Xen tree, I was after the Linux one...
>
> nope, that's my Linux tree disguised as a Xen tree to confuse the
> maintainers ;-)
;-)
> > > It's based on my 3.9-rc3-smp-6 branch currently in linux-next (that is
> > > based on 3.9-rc3).
> > > However lost_ticks_1 is not in linux-next yet.
> >
> > Which branch is in Linux next? It doesn't seem to be your linux-next
> > (last commit 2011).
>
> that would be linux-next from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sstabellini/xen.git
Ah, I was looking in your xenbits tree -- is that deprecated?
Ian.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list