[PATCH 00/04] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4 SoC support V3

[Magnus Damm]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:17:43PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> >> ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4 SoC support V3
>> >> [PATCH 01/04] ARM: shmobile: Initial r8a73a4 SoC support V3
>> >> [PATCH 02/04] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4 SCIF support V3
>> >> [PATCH 03/04] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4 IRQC support V2
>> >> [PATCH 04/04] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4 PFC support
>> >>
>> >> This series is V3 of initial support for the r8a73a4 SoC. The SoC
>> >> is known as r8a73a4 which is built around Cortex-A15 and makes use
>> >> of SCIF for serial, IRQC interrupt controller for external IRQs and
>> >> PFC for combined support for pinmux and GPIO.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>
> Indeed.
>
> Magnus, please let me know if/when you would like me to queue-up these
> patches.

Thanks. Since you bring up the topic, I'd like you to queue up this
patch series more or less right away if possible. =)

About how to handle the dependencies, I am not sure if you intend to
keep the SoC bits separate from the PFC and the board code. It is
possible to split it out by series but if that is needed or not
depends on how the ARM SoC guys want to be fed.

Regardless, this r8a73a4 SoC V3 series depends on the following patch
to compile:
[PATCH/RFC] ARM: shmobile: Disallow PINCTRL without GPIOLIB

Laurent seems OK with the patch above, how about you? I am quite OK
with the above patch as a short term fix. But I believe Linus W and
Laurent at some point need to decide if it is valid to have PINCTL
selected without GPIO.

Thanks,

/ magnus