[RFC patch 02/11] cpuidle / arm : a single cpuidle driver

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 12:44:34 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 12:17 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> All above code is completly generic and I would rather create
> >>> some thing like "drivers/cpuidle/generic-idle.c" where it can
> >>> handle all the registration stuff for all arch's rather than
> >>> just ARM. There is nothing ARM specific in above code IMHO.
> >> Yes, it seems generic but it won't be.
> > It very much sounds like you are going in the wrong direction.  You
> > should be moving towards generic code, not away from generic code.
> 
> Well, I am going to the right direction but with an intermediate step :)
> 
> But indeed, I will introduce this init function in the generic code
> directly and rebase the patchset.
> 
> Rafael, is possible to apply the patches 1 - 5 ? Or shall I resend the
> subset ?

Please repost if you can, with all applicable ACKs.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.