[PATCH 04/10] arm: zynq: Load scu baseaddress at run time

[Rob Herring]

On 03/25/2013 09:51 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> 2013/3/25 Rob Herring <robherring2 at gmail.com>:
>> On 03/25/2013 08:53 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Use Cortex a9 cp15 to read scu baseaddress.

[...]

>>> +static void __init scu_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +     unsigned long base;
>>> +
>>> +     base = scu_a9_get_base();
>>> +     zynq_cortex_a9_scu_map.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(base);
>>> +     zynq_cortex_a9_scu_map.virtual = base;
>>
>> You are setting the virtual address to the physical base?
>>
>>> +     iotable_init(&zynq_cortex_a9_scu_map, 1);
>>
>> Then creating a static mapping...
>>
>>> +     scu_base = ioremap(base, zynq_cortex_a9_scu_map.length);
>>
>> And also a dynamic mapping?
> 
> Yes - exactly.

You are simply getting lucky that it works. If the physical address did
not happen to be in the vmalloc address region, it would not work. You
should not do this because you have an implicit requirement and the code
will look broken to anyone that reads it.

> I was talking to Olof about this code at ELC and he mentioned that someone
> else might know better way how to do it.
> 
> It is quite a long time I played with this code.
> I found this solution in vexpress platform (mach-vexpress/platsmp.c)
> 
> IRC: Static mapping is necessary to be able to access device so early.

Only to read the number of cores. That's not really worth an early
mapping. I would move to using DT to count the number of cores. Support
for that is already in place.

> On the other hand you can't use this static mapping when kernel runs
> for that you need to use dynamic allocation.
> Calling ioremap so early caused that the return address is the same
> and you can just use it later. and it is also in the correct vmalloc area.
> 
> We are using scu_base for power management code.
> Let me check if dynamic mapping is also required.

The should be no reason you need both.

Rob