[PATCH v7 1/2] ARM: davinci: dm365: add support for v4l2 video display

[Prabhakar Lad]

Hi Sekhar,

Thanks for the review!

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com> wrote:
> Prabhakar,
>
> On 3/22/2013 1:33 PM, Prabhakar lad wrote:
>> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg at gmail.com>
>>
>> Create platform devices for various video modules like venc,osd,
>> vpbe and v4l2 driver for dm365.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c |    4 +-
>>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h         |    2 +-
>>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c           |  194 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  3 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>> index c2d4958..cf77c46 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>> @@ -564,8 +564,6 @@ static struct davinci_uart_config uart_config __initdata = {
>>
>>  static void __init dm365_evm_map_io(void)
>>  {
>> -     /* setup input configuration for VPFE input devices */
>> -     dm365_set_vpfe_config(&vpfe_cfg);
>>       dm365_init();
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -597,6 +595,8 @@ static __init void dm365_evm_init(void)
>>
>>       davinci_setup_mmc(0, &dm365evm_mmc_config);
>>
>> +     dm365_init_video(&vpfe_cfg, NULL);
>> +
>>       /* maybe setup mmc1/etc ... _after_ mmc0 */
>>       evm_init_cpld();
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h
>> index 12d544b..1c2670f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/davinci.h
>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ void __init dm365_init_ks(struct davinci_ks_platform_data *pdata);
>>  void __init dm365_init_rtc(void);
>>  void dm365_init_spi0(unsigned chipselect_mask,
>>                       const struct spi_board_info *info, unsigned len);
>> -void dm365_set_vpfe_config(struct vpfe_config *cfg);
>> +int __init dm365_init_video(struct vpfe_config *, struct vpbe_config *);
>
> No need of __init specifier in function declaration.
>
OK

>>
>>  /* DM644x function declarations */
>>  void __init dm644x_init(void);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
>> index f4c19f7..0a2dba2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
>> @@ -40,10 +40,16 @@
>>
>>  #define DM365_REF_FREQ               24000000        /* 24 MHz on the DM365 EVM */
>>
>> +#define DM365_VDAC_CONFIG            0x01c4002c
>
> Please define this in davinci.h as an offset from
> DAVINCI_SYSTEM_MODULE_BASE.
>
OK

>> +
>> +#define DM365_RTC_BASE                       0x01c69000
>> +
>>  /* Base of key scan register bank */
>>  #define DM365_KEYSCAN_BASE           0x01c69400
>>
>> -#define DM365_RTC_BASE                       0x01c69000
>> +#define DM365_OSD_BASE                       0x01c71c00
>> +
>> +#define DM365_VENC_BASE                      0x01c71e00
>>
Are you OK with this definitions or you want all of them in davinci.h ?

>>  #define DAVINCI_DM365_VC_BASE                0x01d0c000
>>  #define DAVINCI_DMA_VC_TX            2
>> @@ -56,6 +62,11 @@
>>  #define DM365_EMAC_CNTRL_RAM_OFFSET  0x1000
>>  #define DM365_EMAC_CNTRL_RAM_SIZE    0x2000
>>
>> +#define DM365_VPSS_CLK_CTRL_ADDR             0x44
>
> This is already defined in davinci.h as SYSMOD_VPSS_CLKCTL. Please use
> the existing definition.
>
OK

>> +#define DM365_VPSS_VENCCLKEN_ENABLE          BIT(3)
>> +#define DM365_VPSS_DACCLKEN_ENABLE           BIT(4)
>> +#define DM365_VPSS_PLLC2SYSCLK5_ENABLE               BIT(5)
>
> Please move these related defintions to davinci.h as well.
>
OK

>> +
>>  static struct pll_data pll1_data = {
>>       .num            = 1,
>>       .phys_base      = DAVINCI_PLL1_BASE,
>> @@ -1233,6 +1244,179 @@ static struct platform_device dm365_isif_dev = {
>>       },
>>  };
>>
>> +static struct resource dm365_osd_resources[] = {
>> +     {
>> +             .start = DM365_OSD_BASE,
>> +             .end   = DM365_OSD_BASE + 0x100,
>
> You ignored by earlier comment to fix this to 0xFF and other such
> occurrences in this patch.
>
Ah missed it, will fix it in next version.

Regards,
--Prabhakar

> Thanks,
> Sekhar