[PATCH] clk: tegra: Don't enable PLLs during early boot

[Peter De Schrijver]

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 04:48:11PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 05:54 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > The PLL code relies on udelay() which is not available when CCF is
> > initialized. Hence we can't enable any PLL during this phase.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver at nvidia.com>
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Stephen,
> > 
> > Can you confirm this is ok for the audio drivers?
> > 
> > We used to be lucky that this has worked up to now, but I will introduce some
> > changes to the pll lock check code which cause this to fail due to the
> > slight differences in timing.
> 
> No, this won't work for the audio drivers; they assume the clock is
> enabled when they start.
> 
> This assumption was made long ago. I know drivers are supposed to assume
> that clocks are disabled when they're probed, but historically that
> wasn't always the case, so if the audio drivers assumed that, and then
> did clk_enable() as the first thing, they got a warning due to the
> enabling an already enabled clock and/or later attempts to disable the

That should be ok. You can enable a clock more than once.

> clocks wouldn't actually disable them. Perhaps this has changed now, but
> either way, audio driver changes would be needed to support this change.
> 

But indeed, the clock won't be disabled then when the driver does
clk_disable(). The reference count will just be decremented. That's however
not a functional problem, just not optimal from a power consumption point of
view. So we could change the drivers first and keep the clocks disabled at
boottime in a second phase.

> Perhaps this is due to initializing the Tegra clock driver in the
> machine descriptor's init_irq function, rather than in the init_machine
> function? Can this be moved?

Maybe. But we need the clockframework before the timers are initialized...
So I have to check the dependencies.

Cheers,

Peter.