[PATCH] mach_omap2: use PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR + PTR_ERR

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:28:47PM -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Sorry I am now not sure I follow you here. Someone just pointed out to
> me that PTR_RET() is defined as ...
> 
> static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr)
> {
> 	if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> 		return PTR_ERR(ptr);
> 	else
> 		return 0;
> }
> 
> So the above change appears to be equivalent. Is there something that is
> wrong with the current implementation that needs to be fixed?

No - I misread it as PTR_ERR not PTR_RET.  Your patch is fine.