[PATCH] dmaengine:sirf:take clock and enable it while probing
Barry Song
21cnbao at gmail.com
Thu Mar 21 08:04:12 EDT 2013
Hi Vinod,
2013/3/21 Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:33:43PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> From: Barry Song <Baohua.Song at csr.com>
>>
>> there is hardcode which enabled the clock of dmaengine before,
>> this patch takes the clock by standard clock API and enable it
>> in probe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song at csr.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
>> index 1d627e2..c439529 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/sirfsoc_dma.h>
>>
>> #include "dmaengine.h"
>> @@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ struct sirfsoc_dma {
>> struct sirfsoc_dma_chan channels[SIRFSOC_DMA_CHANNELS];
>> void __iomem *base;
>> int irq;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> bool is_marco;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -639,6 +641,12 @@ static int sirfsoc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + sdma->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> NULL? Arent you supposed to send a avlid non global string with. It may work now
> but do you really want to go that path?
yes. the NULL is right. the binding between clock and device has been mapped.
>
>> + if (IS_ERR(sdma->clk)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get a clock.\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(sdma->clk);
>> + }
>> +
>> ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &res);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Error parsing memory region!\n");
>> @@ -698,6 +706,8 @@ static int sirfsoc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>>
>> tasklet_init(&sdma->tasklet, sirfsoc_dma_tasklet, (unsigned long)sdma);
>>
>> + clk_prepare_enable(sdma->clk);
> shouldnt you be enabling clock when you start a txn. Keeping clock on in probe
> doesnt seem too smart
currently we don't have runtime PM tested and supported yet. so i'd
like to handle this in runtime PM callbacks later.
for the moment, i prefer we have enable/disable in probing/removing
like most drivers which don't have runtime pm at first.
>
>> +
>> /* Register DMA engine */
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, sdma);
>> ret = dma_async_device_register(dma);
>> @@ -720,6 +730,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_dma_remove(struct platform_device *op)
>> struct device *dev = &op->dev;
>> struct sirfsoc_dma *sdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(sdma->clk);
>> dma_async_device_unregister(&sdma->dma);
>> free_irq(sdma->irq, sdma);
>> irq_dispose_mapping(sdma->irq);
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>
-barry
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list