[PATCH v3 0/9] refactoring for mask_cache

Gerlando Falauto gerlando.falauto at keymile.com
Thu Mar 21 06:37:25 EDT 2013


Hi Thomas,

first of all thanks for your patience.

On 03/20/2013 10:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
>> On 03/19/2013 12:56 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:44:31AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
>
>> 3) Jason, did you mean you would pull it to
>> http://git.infradead.org/users/jcooper/linux.git? Shall I change the SOB lines
>> and resubmit? Or should I submit it somewhere else instead?
>
> That needs to go through my tree, really. And please just post it to
> LKML with the relevant people CC'ed.

So drop linux-kernel-arm?

>> 4) About submitting to -stable, I guess it wouldn't make any sense until it
>> gets included upstream
>
> Right. Though I'm a bit concerned about the amount of change
> involved. So it's simpler to do:
>
> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # simple resolution will be sent in reply

You mean per-patch (in the SOB area)? Or just in the cover letter? 
[Since when does the cover letter have a SOB area?]
Or just adding it as a plain "Cc:" recipient?
In any case, before waiting for mainstream inclusion?

I'm sorry for such stupid questions, but I'm getting even more confused...

> Then let the people who have this problem reply on that patch series
> with a simple revert of that generic_chip() conversion commit
> concering their particular subarchitecture instead of forcing a
> nightmare of complex (and maybe untested) changes onto stable.

I think I understand the idea, though you've lost me completely as far 
as the process is concerned...

A pointer to a FMTR (assuming there is one that I could be RTFM-ed to) 
would be very much appreciated. Sorry again for my newbieness.

Thanks again!
Gerlando



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list