[PATCH 1/1] clk: Add notifier support in clk_prepare/clk_unprepare

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Bill Huang (2013-03-19 21:39:44)
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 11:31 +0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Bill Huang (2013-03-19 19:55:49)
> > > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 01:01 +0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > Quoting Bill Huang (2013-03-19 06:28:32)
> > > > > Add notifier calls in clk_prepare and clk_unprepare so drivers which are
> > > > > interested in knowing that clk_prepare/unprepare call can act accordingly.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The existing "clk_set_rate" notifier is not enough for normal DVFS
> > > > > inplementation since clock might be enabled/disabled at runtime. Adding
> > > > > these notifiers is useful on DVFS core which take clk_prepare as a hint
> > > > > on that the notified clock might be enabled later so it can raise voltage
> > > > > to a safe level before enabling the clock, and take clk_unprepare as a
> > > > > hint that the clock has been disabled and is safe to lower the voltage.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The added notifier events are:
> > > > > 
> > > > > PRE_CLK_PREPARE
> > > > > POST_CLK_PREPARE
> > > > > ABORT_CLK_PREPARE
> > > > > PRE_CLK_UNPREPARE
> > > > > POST_CLK_UNPREPARE
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bill Huang <bilhuang at nvidia.com>
> > > > 
> > > > I'm still not sure about this approach.  Based on feedback I got from
> > > > Linaro Connect I am not convinced that scaling voltage through clk
> > > > rate-change notifiers is the right way to go.  As I understand it this
> > > > patch only exists for that single purpose, so if the voltage-notifier
> > > > idea gets dropped then I will not take this patch in.
> > > > 
> > > Thanks Mike, actually we won't use your "clk: notifier handler for
> > > dynamic voltage scaling" patch instead we are trying to port our DVFS
> > > into Non-CPU DVFS framework "devfreq" which will need to hook those
> > > notifiers, without the clock notifiers been extended the framework is
> > > useless for us since we cannot do polling due to the fact that polling
> > > is not in real time. If it ended up extending the notifiers cannot
> > > happen then the only choice for us I think would be giving up "devfreq"
> > > and implement them in Tegra's "clk_hw".
> > 
> > I'm familiar with the devfreq framework.  Can you explain further how
> > you plan to use devfreq with the clock notifiers?  What does the call
> > graph look like?
> > 
> The call graph will look like this, when any DVFS interested clock rate
> changes (including enable and disable) happen -> Tegra devfreq clock
> notifier is called -> call into update_devfreq if needed -> in
> update_devfreq it will call into .get_target_freq in Tegra
> "devfreq_governor" -> and then call into .target of tegra
> devfreq_dev_profile to set voltage and done. More details are as below.
> 
> We'll create devfreq driver for Tegra VDD_CORE rail, and the safe
> voltage level of the rail is determined by tens of clocks (2d, 3d,
> mpe,...), all the frequency ladders of those clocks are defined in DT
> also the operating points for VDD_CORE is declared in DT where its
> frequency will be more of a virtual clock or index.
> 
>         operating-points = <
>         /* virtual-kHz  uV */
>         0       950000
>         1       1000000
>         2       1050000
>         3       1100000
>         4       1150000
>         5       1200000
>         6       1250000
>         7       1300000
>         8       1350000
> 
> Register a Tegra governor where the callback .get_target_freq is the
> function to determine the overall frequency it can go to, and
> the .target callback in "devfreq_dev_profile" will be the function
> really do the voltage scaling.
> 
> Tegra devfreq driver will register clock notifiers on all its interested
> clock and hence when any of those clock rate changes, disabled, enabled,
> we'll specifically call update_devfreq in the notifier.

Thank you for the explanation.  Do you plan to use actual devfreq
governors (like simple-ondemand, or something custom) for changing OPPs,
or do you just plan to use the clock framework as a trigger for DVFS?

Regards,
Mike