Linux 3.8.3

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 09:33:21PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:00:08PM +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > “make ARCH=arm menuconfig”  no complains,  but "make ARCH=arm
> > CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf-" failed:
> > 
> > $ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf-
> >   CHK     include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
> >   CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
> > make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.h' is up to date.
> >   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> >   CHK     include/generated/compile.h
> >   CHK     kernel/config_data.h
> >   Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready
> >   Kernel: arch/arm/boot/zImage is ready
> >   Building modules, stage 2.
> >   MODPOST 1904 modules
> > ERROR: "flush_tlb_kernel_range" [drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.ko]
> > undefined!
> > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> > make: *** [modules] Error 2
> > 
> > Please find the attachment with .config.gz file.
> 
> linux-arm-kernel might have more information about this.

Sigh.

At times, I really don't know why I bother wasting my time commenting on
patches if they just go and agree with them, and promptly ignore them.
I pointed out what this should be:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135972750522902&w=2

And it was agreed:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135993546317541&w=2

But for some reason the wrong patch got merged:

http://marc.info/?l=git-commits-head&m=136147889001219&w=2

Maybe because it was "simpler" ?  Don't know.  But... well, we now know
what the outcome of it was.  Let's try a different technique.  I'm going
to say nothing of any real help and hopefully it will get fixed properly.
Maybe that'll work.