[PATCH V6] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_section for unaligned addresses

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:28:51AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2013 05:56 PM, R Sricharan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Monday 11 February 2013 07:22 PM, R Sricharan wrote:
> >> Hi Russell,
> >>
> >> On Monday 11 February 2013 06:42 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:13:29AM +0000, R Sricharan wrote:
> >>>> +static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> >>>> +                      unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys,
> >>>> +                      const struct mem_type *type)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +    pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> >>>> +    unsigned long next;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    do {
> >>>>           /*
> >>>> -         * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
> >>>> -         * individual L1 entries.
> >>>> +         * With LPAE, we must loop over to map
> >>>> +         * all the pmds for the given range.
> >>>>            */
> >>>> -        alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> >>>> -    }
> >>>> +        next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        /*
> >>>> +         * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be
> >>>> +         * aligned to a section boundary.
> >>>> +         */
> >>>
> >>> Should this read "next, addr and phys" instead of "end..."?
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise:
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> >>>
> >>   Can I put this in to patch system ?
> >
> >    Ping..
> >
> > Regards,
> >  Sricharan
>  Ping again..

Do we have a winner out of all the patches which have been posted yet?