[PATCHv3 03/14] mailbox: OMAP: introduce mailbox framework

Anna, Suman s-anna at ti.com
Thu Mar 14 14:30:45 EDT 2013


> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Anna, Suman <s-anna at ti.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna at linaro.org>
> >> (...)
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna at linaro.org>
> >> > [s-anna at ti.com: Kconfig fixes for build errors]
> >> > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> >>
> >> It's not like I care super-much, but I think your SoB should be at the bottom.
> >>
> >> It's a simple git rebase -i anyway...
> >
> > Sure, will do. Only this patch, right? I have my SoB only on one another original
> patch, will adjust on that as well, but all the remaining ones will have yours at the
> bottom.
> 
> No I mean that the SoB-order should reflect the code flow path, and yours should
> be at the bottom of all of them, but as noted I don't care much. In my case the
> only thing I did was to pass the code :-)

Thanks for the clarification. I have updated the branch accordingly.

Regards,
Suman



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list