ARM: at-91: ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 went missing
Nicolas Ferre
nicolas.ferre at atmel.com
Thu Mar 14 04:30:16 EDT 2013
On 03/14/2013 09:17 AM, Paul Bolle :
> On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 13:26 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> wrote:
>> but the ARCH_AT91SAM9x5 never exist at the mainline
>
> I'm not sure I understand this.
>
> We're discussing the effects of commit
> 1e3ce2b8545390a2aee8dbfcd49ca4161b636000 ("AR[M]: at91: introduce
> SOC_AT91xxx define to allow to compile SoC core support") here. It did
> remove ARCH_AT91SAM9X5:
> $ git show 1e3ce2b8545390a2aee8dbfcd49ca4161b636000 | grep ARCH_AT91SAM9X5
> -config ARCH_AT91SAM9X5
> @@ -93,8 +91,47 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9X5
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9X5) += at91sam9x5.o
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9X5
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9X5)
>
> It also added SOC_AT91SAM9X5, and that symbol even triggers the
> compilation of a file named at91sam9x5.c:
> $ git show 1e3ce2b8545390a2aee8dbfcd49ca4161b636000 | grep SOC_AT91SAM9X5
> +config SOC_AT91SAM9X5
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9X5) += at91sam9x5.o
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9X5
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9X5)
>
> And also note that ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 still is used as an (optional) dependency:
> $ git grep -n ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 v3.9-rc2
> v3.9-rc2:drivers/net/can/Kconfig:68: depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9263 || ARCH_AT91SAM9X5
Which is removed by patch:
"[PATCH v2 2/2] can: Kconfig: CAN_AT91 depends on ARM"
It should appear in CAN git tree soon.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list