[PATCH 2/4] clk: samsung: remove np check in clock init

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Dienstag, 12. März 2013, 10:36:54 schrieb Thomas Abraham:
> On 12 March 2013 14:47, Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 12. März 2013, 10:02:55 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> >> Am Dienstag, 12. März 2013, 09:53:00 schrieb Thomas Abraham:
> >> > On 12 March 2013 05:14, Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> >> > > This let to the suspend init never being reached on non-DT
> >> > > platforms.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stueber <heiko at sntech.de>
> >> > > ---
> >> > > 
> >> > >  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c |    2 --
> >> > >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> > > 
> >> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> >> > > index d36cdd5..1a5de69 100644
> >> > > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> >> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> >> > > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ void __init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node
> >> > > *np, void __iomem *base,
> >> > > 
> >> > >                 unsigned long nr_rdump)
> >> > >  
> >> > >  {
> >> > >  
> >> > >         reg_base = base;
> >> > > 
> >> > > -       if (!np)
> >> > > -               return;
> >> > 
> >> > Hi Heiko,
> >> > 
> >> > Sorry, I did not understand the need for this. Could you please add
> >> > few more details on this change.
> >> 
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >> 
> >> On non-dt platforms the init would stop here, therefore never reaching
> >> the code that inits the syscore ops below to save the register values
> >> on suspend and restores them on resume.
> >> 
> >> I might be overlooking something, but I think we want to save/restore
> >> the register values on both dt and non-dt platforms.
> > 
> > ok, I did overlook something :-)
> > 
> > The register saving seems to be done separately on non-dt platforms
> > (mach- exynos/pm.c for example). So I probably need to redo patch 2 and
> > 3.
> 
> The register saving is supposed to be done in the clock driver itself
> for both dt and non-dt platforms. So you are right in pointing out
> this issue.
>
> But in this patch, removing the check on 'np' is not right. Because,
> on builds were CONFIG_OF is enabled but kernel image executing on
> non-dt platforms, the allocation of clk_table should be avoided.
> 
> So instead of removing the check on 'np', the code inside #ifdef
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP should be placed after the assignment to reg_base. The
> check on 'np' should then follow.

The following two patches do exactly that ... allocating the clk_table all the 
time, to allow us to add separate aliases to clocks later.

So I'll wait until we talked about them :-) .


Thanks for looking thru the patches
Heiko