[PATCH v11 4/9] usb: chipidea: udc: add pullup/pulldown dp at hw_device_state
Peter Chen
peter.chen at freescale.com
Wed Mar 6 21:36:13 EST 2013
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:26:33PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 05:56:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > - During the connect/disconnect host, we need to pullup
> > and pulldown dp
> > - Make sure the dp is not pullup until the vbus is on when
> > flag CI13XXX_PULLUP_ON_VBUS is set
> > - Using hw_device_state when set run/stop bit
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen at freescale.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > index e82dae4..70f9f2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > @@ -91,8 +91,10 @@ static int hw_device_state(struct ci13xxx *ci, u32 dma)
> > /* interrupt, error, port change, reset, sleep/suspend */
> > hw_write(ci, OP_USBINTR, ~0,
> > USBi_UI|USBi_UEI|USBi_PCI|USBi_URI|USBi_SLI);
> > + hw_write(ci, OP_USBCMD, USBCMD_RS, USBCMD_RS);
> > } else {
> > hw_write(ci, OP_USBINTR, ~0, 0);
> > + hw_write(ci, OP_USBCMD, USBCMD_RS, 0);
>
> this patch doesn't make sense to me. What will happen is that you will
> be enabling pullups when vbus_session() gets called and this might not
> be what gadget driver wants.
>
> You don't want to fiddle with that yourself since I'm changing the
> framework so that gadget driver will always request pullups to be
> enabled.
Hi Felipe,
Do you think pullup dp without vbus is a valid operation?
Current udc core code makes that possible.
But I think current your udc core code (add pullup after loading gadget)
make benefit for udc driver who has not vbus operation.
For chipidea driver:
- If vbus is there before load gadget module, the pullup dp is done by udc
core code.
- If vbus is not there before load gadget module, the pullup will be done
when the vbus is there.
>
> Alex, I don't think this patch is correct
>
> --
> balbi
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list