[PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: dts: omap5: add dwc3 core dt data
kishon
kishon at ti.com
Wed Mar 6 04:21:14 EST 2013
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 02:49 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:25:48PM +0530, kishon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday 05 March 2013 08:09 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:07:03PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> Add dwc3 core dt data as a subnode to dwc3 omap glue data in omap5 dt
>>>> data file. The information for the entered data node is available @
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
>>>> index c4eb2ec..24dd69f 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
>>>> @@ -514,6 +514,13 @@
>>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>>> utmi-mode = <2>;
>>>> ranges;
>>>> + dwc3 at 4a030000 {
>>>> + compatible = "synopsys,dwc3";
>>>> + reg = <0x4a030000 0x1000>;
>>>> + interrupts = <0 92 4>;
>>>> + usb-phy = <&usb2_phy>, <&usb3_phy>;
>>>> + tx-fifo-resize;
>>>
>>> I think this should be merged with previous patch. Also, we need to
>>> check whether tx-fifo-resize is needed with ES2 or not ;-)
>>
>> yeah. ES2 works without tx-fifo-resize.
>
> Great, I guess we can deprecate that attribute. Can you check if ES2
> still works with:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index 82e160e..cad0131 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -2029,6 +2029,8 @@ static void dwc3_gadget_usb3_phy_suspend(struct dwc3 *dwc, int suspend)
> {
> u32 reg;
>
> + return;
> +
> reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL(0));
>
> if (suspend)
> @@ -2043,6 +2045,8 @@ static void dwc3_gadget_usb2_phy_suspend(struct dwc3 *dwc, int suspend)
> {
> u32 reg;
>
> + return;
> +
> reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG(0));
>
> if (suspend)
>
>
> starting on 1.94a (IIRC) core was supposed to control PHYs directly and
> since there's nobody in linux mainline using any version prior to 1.94a,
> we could drop that too.
Will check that in a while.
Thanks
Kishon
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list