[PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx: clk-pllv3: change wait method for PLL lock
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Jun 6 05:21:56 EDT 2013
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:55:26PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> @@ -62,9 +63,11 @@ static int clk_pllv3_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> writel_relaxed(val, pll->base);
>
> /* Wait for PLL to lock */
> - while (!(readl_relaxed(pll->base) & BM_PLL_LOCK))
> - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> + while (!(readl_relaxed(pll->base) & BM_PLL_LOCK)) {
> + udelay(100);
> + if (--count == 0)
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
This is still buggy in the ways you describe above.
do {
if (readl_relaxed(pll->base) & BM_PLL_LOCK)
break;
udelay(100);
} while (--count);
if (count == 0 && !(readl_relaxed(pll->base) & BM_PLL_LOCK))
return -ETIMEDOUT;
Notice - we only return -ETIMEDOUT if the condition we're waiting for
has not been satisfied _after_ the loop terminates, specifically, if
this happens during the last 100us of our wait.
You can apply the same fix to your original; you don't need to move
to using udelay() and a counter if you can tolerate some noise in
the waiting time.
The lesson here is: if you're waiting for any kind of an event, then
be very careful how you code the failure path so you don't miss a
success coincident with the timeout condition becoming true.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list