[PATCH 00/15] ARM: shmobile: uImage load address rework

Magnus Damm magnus.damm at gmail.com
Wed Jun 5 04:51:27 EDT 2013


Hi Morimoto-san,

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>> ARM: shmobile: uImage load address rework
>>
>> [PATCH 01/15] ARM: shmobile: Per-board uImage load addresses
>> [PATCH 02/15] ARM: shmobile: AG5EVM uImage rework
>> [PATCH 03/15] ARM: shmobile: AP4EVB uImage rework
>> [PATCH 04/15] ARM: shmobile: APE6EVM uImage rework
>> [PATCH 05/15] ARM: shmobile: Armadillo800EVA uImage rework
>> [PATCH 06/15] ARM: shmobile: Bock-W uImage rework
>> [PATCH 07/15] ARM: shmobile: Bonito uImage rework
>> [PATCH 08/15] ARM: shmobile: KZM9D uImage rework
>> [PATCH 09/15] ARM: shmobile: KZM9G uImage rework
>> [PATCH 10/15] ARM: shmobile: Kota2 uImage rework
>> [PATCH 11/15] ARM: shmobile: Lager uImage rework
>> [PATCH 12/15] ARM: shmobile: Mackerel uImage rework
>> [PATCH 13/15] ARM: shmobile: Marzen uImage rework
>> [PATCH 14/15] ARM: shmobile: Armadillo800EVA reference uImage rework
>> [PATCH 15/15] ARM: shmobile: Remove MEMORY_START uImage load address
>
> I tested these patches on Bock-W board (as 0x60008000 binary),
> and on Mackerel board (as 0x40008000 binary)
> These work well for me :)

Thanks for testing.

> I have same opinion with Laurent.
> 5) and 14) can be 1 patch if you need to sent v2 patches :P

Gotcha!

> for 6), 12) patch
>
> Tested-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
>
> for all patches
>
> Reviewed-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>

Thanks,

/ magnus



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list