[RESEND] cpuidle for ARM pull request

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 07/27/2013 02:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, July 27, 2013 08:13:31 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/26/2013 02:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, July 26, 2013 12:41:09 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> On Friday, July 26, 2013 12:29:08 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, July 26, 2013 12:07:03 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/16/2013 02:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The first PR was against the linux-pm-next tree including the patch:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "cpuidle: Add Kconfig.arm and move calxeda, kirkwood and zynq"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch has been dropped in the meantime.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is a new PR where my tree has been rebased against linux-pm-next
>>>>>>> and adding the patch mentioned above.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As stated by Rafael, I will handle the ARM specific patches from now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following changes since commit 48f99d5a97d32d70c0738d6e314d9f4dbefd89bf:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Merge branch 'pm-cpuidle-next' into linux-next (2013-07-16 02:41:06 +0200)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/linux.git cpuidle/arm-next
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 2b7e79f4a75e803184f483985a25cc751a990f06:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   ARM: ux500: cpuidle: Move ux500 cpuidle driver to drivers/cpuidle
>>>>>>> (2013-07-16 13:57:24 +0200)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ping ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, something distracted me.  I'll pull it later today unless there are any
>>>>> problems (in which case I'll let you know).
>>>>
>>>> Well, there are some.
>>>>
>>>> It is based on my linux-next branch, but please rebase it on top of 3.11-rc2.
>>>>
>>>> Generally, please send me pull requests based on -rc kernels only (or major
>>>> releases).
>>>
>>> Unless your material depends on new things in my linux-next branch, in which
>>> case please let me know and I'll set up a stable branch for you to base things
>>> on.
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> I rebased my branch on top of 3.11-rc2, you can try to pull it again.
> 
> Pulled, thanks!
> 
> Next time, can you please add a general description of what the patches do and
> why they do that to the pull request?

Yes, sure. I will do.

>> I thought it would have been easier for us if I could based my PRs on
>> top of your linux-next branch, so acting as a proxy for ARM patches. I
>> am maintaining the clocksource drivers and I am basing my tree on top of
>> tip/core.
>>
>> I guess you are rebasing your tree often and this is an issue for you,
>> right ?
> 
> Yes, my linux-next branch may contain commits that will be modified later
> (e.g. ACKs added, fixes folded in etc.).
> 
> Anyway, as I said, as long as the material you have for me doesn't depend on
> anything new in my tree, it's better to base it on top of an -rc kernel.
> 
> In case it does depend on that, I've put the entire outstanding cpuidle
> material into my pm-cpuidle branch (including your ARM commits just pulled).

Ok, thanks.

  -- Daniel



-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog