[PATCH 2/6] USB: add devicetree helpers for determining dr_mode and phy_type

Greg KH greg at kroah.com
Thu Jan 31 04:20:59 EST 2013


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:01:09AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> From: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de>
> 
> This adds two little devicetree helper functions for determining the
> dr_mode (host, peripheral, otg) and phy_type (utmi, ulpi,...) from
> the devicetree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik at pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/phy/Makefile |    1 +
>  drivers/usb/phy/phy.c    |   10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/usb/usb-common.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/usb/of.h   |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/usb/otg.h  |    7 +++++++
>  include/linux/usb/phy.h  |    9 +++++++++
>  6 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/usb/of.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/Makefile b/drivers/usb/phy/Makefile
> index 9fa6327..e1be1e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  ccflags-$(CONFIG_USB_DEBUG) := -DDEBUG
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_USB_OTG_UTILS)		+= phy.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF)			+= of.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_USB2)			+= omap-usb2.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_USB3)			+= omap-usb3.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_CONTROL_USB)		+= omap-control-usb.o
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> index ef35eb0..3ad4b5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
> +/*
> + * phy.c -- USB phy handling
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2004 Texas Instruments
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */

Do you really mean to change the license of the file from GPLv2 to
GPLv2+?  Did TI agree to that licening change?  I need some
documentation from some TI people before I can ever accept something
like this.

thanks,

greg k-h



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list